Samsung With 10 Camera How Many Megapixels

“Reimagined” camera. Payback for savings in Galaxy S8

The most interesting thing is that “there is nothing new in the S9!” yelling the same people who recognized last year’s Galaxy S8 as a radical new smartphone. Which once again proves to us. Everyone is interested in the wrapper, not. Just as in the iPhone X everyone is discussing the “bangs” at the top of the screen, and not the technical component, the first association with the Samsung Galaxy S8 was the screen. Big, bright, unusual (then) screen.

And no one is confused that the screen was just not a novelty and first appeared in the LG G6. And no one now remembers that the main drawback of last year’s S8 was the camera. The Koreans were so carried away by gluing a “frameless” screen and

The development of the Bixby voice assistant, which simply rearranged the camera from the Samsung Galaxy S7 / S7 edge to a new generation smartphone. This “hack”, by the way, happened for the first time in the history of Galaxy S. Never before have processors, screens or batteries migrated from last year’s model to a new one.

That said, the Galaxy S8’s camera was terrible. On the contrary. In 2016, when the S7 edge came out, it was of record quality right before the appearance of a cooler cameraphone (which otherwise turned out to be a rubbish rubbish), the Google Pixel. And the quality margin was enough so that in 2017 the Galaxy S8 did not fail in shooting quality “below the waterline”, but stayed above almost all Chinese and eminent colleagues who, with camera settings, “shoot” themselves in the foot every year (Sony and LG).

But at the end of the year, saving on the camera led to the fact that Samsung was plugged in the belt in terms of shooting quality by everyone who was not too lazy.

Not only Google Pixels and iPhones, but also the flagship Huawei. And Xiaomi, whose hands always grew in the wrong direction in photography, almost caught up with the formidable, steep and expensive Galaxy S8 with the Mi Note 3. For us, this is just a joke and grounds for reasoning on the topic “Samsung has slipped”, but those who bought an S8 for 55-60 thousand rubles in the spring-summer of 2017 expected something more from a smartphone than a camera of the level of cheap Xiaomi.

Partly for this reason, Samsung has emphasized that the camera is new in the Galaxy S9. Completely new. The coolest. He also provided evidence of steepness, and they sound convincing.

Duty increase in processor and graphics power

When asked “what has changed in the Galaxy S9 processor compared to the S8?” in the case of Exynos, the easiest answer is “everything!”: new processor cores, a faster modem (up to 1200/200 Mbps for downloading / uploading), a new accelerator, a slightly modified technical process. Unless the RAM has not changed in terms of speed, and the shameful 4 GB of RAM in the S9 is already embarrassing for the flagship of 2018. But 6 GB in the S9 account for the new model just right.

Samsung Galaxy S9 (Exynos 9810) in Geekbench

So. “on paper” the new processor is 35% faster than the old one, but somehow it is 12-15% slower than the processor in the iPhone X. And the game graphics are marking time practically in place. In this regard, the S9 is hardly faster than last year’s S8. Nevertheless, Samsung’s own Mongoose M3 cores “chew” heavy applications much faster, and an economical unit made of Cortex-A55 cores is slightly faster than the currently popular A53 and saves energy better if you use a smartphone for trivial tasks.

Total: Samsung S9 with Exynos 9810 processor is the most powerful Android smartphone for working with applications, and S9 with Snapdragon 845 on board is slower in “general jurisdiction” applications, but copes better with games.

So far there is nothing to tell about the speed of work in the system. The S9 copies at the exhibition are not that the benchmarks were not allowed to run, but even the screenshot was saved in memory. And Android 8 with a Samsung shell is slightly different from what we saw in the latest updates on the S8 and Note8. We can only say with certainty that the camera starts up faster and there are no slowdowns or jerks in the test S9.

The first smartphone that can “squint” and “open your eyes”. Better than all competitors

The first and coolest thing about the Samsung Galaxy S9 is the variable aperture camera. Aperture is an indicator that measures, roughly speaking, with how wide the “eyes” of the smartphone are. The wider the aperture (the smaller the number in the aperture characteristic after the shot), the better the smartphone sees in the dark. It would seem. “lift his (smartphone) eyelids”, like Viyu, and no problem! But there are problems, because, firstly, a wide aperture is difficult to implement in a thin smartphone body (in the same “DSLRs” the shutter that adjusts the aperture is not very compact). And secondly, a too wide aperture when shooting objects in the middle ground and near too “lathers” the background or “brightens” the pictures where it is undesirable.

Change of “aperture” between the day.

Therefore, in sunny weather, when there is plenty of light, people put on sunglasses, and smartphones take pictures well even with a “clamped” aperture. And at night, when the smartphone has to look at the world through a small camera opening, the clarity of the picture depends on how wide it is.

In manual mode, you can seamlessly and quickly switch between two aperture sizes

In order to have fewer hardware “twists” in the smartphone camera, manufacturers did not bother before and simply tried to produce smartphones with the widest aperture. At least f / 2.0, and more often. F / 1.8 or even less. Especially in 2017, LG distinguished itself in this respect when it released the V30 with a record-breaking aperture of f / 1.6. But in retaliation it saved on the quality of the sensor in the smartphone.

Samsung also saves on the number of cameras in the younger version of S9, which was deprived of a wide-format camera.

Standard and widescreen cameras in the Samsung Galaxy S9

For the rest, the sensor in the camera is flagship and large, 1 / 2.5 ”, image stabilization is also in place, and the aperture ranges from a record f / 1.5 for a phone for low light to f / 2.4 so that the electronics do not have to deal with the sensor “foolish” from excessive sunlight. Nobody has done this before Samsung. There is no other smartphone camera with a moderate number of megapixels, a large sensor, good optics and a variable aperture in nature. over, in auto mode, the phone “twists” this diaphragm itself, and in manual shooting you can choose from two aperture options. The dream of a person who changes a DSLR / mirrorless camera to a smartphone to take a photo somewhere in cramped conditions!

So that the article does not look completely “sweet”, I can share the impressions of fellow “reviewers” who managed to take comparative photos on the Galaxy S9 and the old flagships of Samsung. So. The algorithms on smartphones, which were shown at the MWC exhibition, until they squeeze “all the juices” out of the camera. Galaxy S8 and last year’s Sony Xperia, the new Samsung leaves behind (which is not so difficult), but in comparison with the Galaxy Note8 it almost always goes on a par, and occasionally turns out to be either a little better or a little worse than a “shovel phone” with a stylus. However, if you remember, the Galaxy S7 in the first couple of months also managed to photograph sometimes worse than the Galaxy S6, and strove to add pink color to the pictures. And only after several firmware updates did the algorithms return to normal.

Design and body. Slightly larger, but much more comfortable than the S8 and other smartphones with 18: 9 display

Headphone jack and memory card slot in place. It’s almost a sensation in smartphones in 2018

The second (after the camera) “thorn in the fifth point” of Galaxy S8 owners was the ergonomics of the case. “It’s okay that it’s thick. But the screen is hoo!” “Heavy, but I love heavy smartphones.” “Slippery, but now every flagship is slippery.” “The scanner God knows where? And I’ll unblock it with a face scan! Which works so-so. ” Read these and other “excuses” in the new collected essays “I bought a Samsung flagship”.

It’s amazing that the heavy and thick (by the standards of flagships, of course) S8 and S8 have turned into even heavier and thicker S9 and S9, but. They have become more convenient to use! They bother with ergonomics and this is noticeable.

The most beautiful and recognizable Galaxy S9. In the color “ultraviolet”

Firstly, smartphones have become a little wider (0.4 mm for S9 and 0.6 mm for S9) S8 and S8, so the display is not stretched to the sides as deep as it was before, but “ends” a little earlier. We recall an increase of 0.5 mm in thickness and we get a smartphone that is comfortable to hold in the hand, as if there is no “framelessness” in it.

The S9 is thicker, but the comfortable sidewalls are worth the sacrifice

Feels like the S9 and S9 are much closer to the candy-light LG V30, which is good! At the same time, Samsung retained the headphone jack in the case (let’s not point a finger at the scoundrels who didn’t) and endowed the S9 / S9 with stereo speakers. The sound from the speakers, by the way, is not bad. Better than in the Xiaomi Mi6 and is similar to that of the Nexus 6P, only with a slightly cut bass.

And a scanner! The scanner is where it belongs! And in “just S9”, and in the “plus”! Probably, the developers of the Galaxy S8 had enough hiccups when customers swore, didn’t get into the scanner the first time and dirty the camera. Now it’s impossible to accidentally hit the camera with your finger, and the banner of the most unsuccessfully located fingerprint scanner goes to the Sony Xperia XZ2 and XZ2 Compact.

Just a year of bullying in the S8, S8 and Note8. And the scanner is back in place

The main problem is the most easily soiled case among all Galaxy generations. Surprisingly, not slippery (oleophobic coating on the back cover?), But you take it in your hand. And after that the case looks terrible. Before that, only the Sony Xperia XZ Premium was just as hopelessly dirty. And the block of sensors under the flash on the back side looks like some kind of “technoerotic” in the bad sense of the word. As if the smartphone was being repaired in a “collective farm” manner and lost some kind of decorative lining between the “giblets” and the beautiful back cover.

The design is not radically new, but smartphones still look nicer than the S8 and S8

But there is nothing to say about the display. Even if it became “better” on paper, I personally did not notice any revolutionary changes under the spotlights and in the bustle of a technical exhibition. Will come for a review. Let’s figure out the nuances of the new AMOLED matrix in a meticulous way.

Animoji. Worse similarity than iPhone X, better usability

Another feature that Samsung frankly copied from competitors, because “look, people liked it!” If we distract ourselves from the fact that drawing a cartoon of ourselves in order to grimace in correspondence, this entertainment is not for every day and not for every interlocutor, then we must admit that the function completely copies the one that Apple slapped at the time of the iPhone X announcement in September 2017. With differences in nuances.

Apple still uses 3D scanning to make the animoji look more or less realistic. Samsung relies on a simple selfie, and draws details of the “face” at random. On the one hand, with a simpler system, you can sculpt emoji from anyone. Just a full face photo with a closed mouth. But the detail and similarity are noticeably worse than they were in the iPhone. If the Korean engineer turned out to be quite authentic animoji, then my “survey” physiognomy turned out to be very far from the original. And not only mine. My colleagues are also not happy with their cartoon self-portraits.

But in Samsung, you can send your “cartoons” to Facebook Messenger and Whatsapp, and children will love high-quality animoji templates with Disney characters. Yes, there are no such animoji in other Android smartphones, but the Koreans in this regard did not jump to the iPhone.

Bixby (built-in assistant). Good among its own kind, but only for English-speaking users

Your smartphone detects what you eat.

Bixby also understands exactly the ingredients (and not like in the LG V30s.) what dishes you photograph, and allows you to add them to the diet list so that you can count calories later. Most people do not care, but athletes and those who are on a diet for weight loss will be happy.

Choose your makeup.

Yes, some of the functionality of Bixby is also found in other smartphones. Motorola X4, for example, also know how to tell what landmark you just photographed, LG V30s, Huawei Mate 10 Pro and Honor View 10 understand what you are photographing and adjust the camera settings so that food looked better, and the cats. Clearer, even if they very quickly rush around the apartment. Finally, there is the universal Google Assistant, which works on any Android smartphone and does a lot of what Bixby can do. It just lacks some of the Bixby features, and Bixby lacks most of the Google Assistant features. Therefore, “it is very good to have two wives. Much better on either side.” Another thing is that Bixby, as it was a useless appendage (and a damn button that gets in the way on the side edge), has remained. Maybe next time it will be brought to mind and forced to work adequately in our conditions.

Previously, you did not use the standard DeX, but now you can not use it with the functionality of a smartphone-touchpad!

I appeal to those who understand this. How to find out if it changes or not?

Camera how many megapixels should the phone have /

Camera for good photo quality?

 

The number of pixels is the number of points from which the image is ultimately composed. The more of these dots, the more detailed the image. And of course, 12 million pixels (megapixels) are better than 2.
But! To get a high-quality photo of a standard 10×15 size, 2-3 megapixels are enough. For a photo the size of an A4 sheet. 4. 6 megapixels. If you want to make photo wallpaper in your room. No less than 10 :).
–
Outcome:
– decide on the task. What you will shoot. The Ivanov family on barbecue or panoramic views of night cities and the Milky Way.
– think about what you will do with the footage later. Print 10×15, send small photos by mail or take a photo for the cover of a glossy magazine.
– evaluate your skills. You will use the fully automatic shooting mode so that you just press the button or you have already filled your hand in photography and you will make the necessary settings for the task you need better than any “automatic machines”.
–
How do you decide on these three points. It will be easier to answer and you can reasonably recommend the best option for you.

The number of pixels is the number of points from which the image is ultimately composed. The more of these dots, the more detailed the image. And of course, 12 million pixels (megapixels) are better than 2.
But! To get a high-quality photo of a standard 10×15 size, 2-3 megapixels are enough. For a photo the size of an A4 sheet. 4. 6 megapixels. If you want to make photo wallpaper in your room. No less than 10 :).
–
Outcome:
– decide on the task. What you will shoot. The Ivanov family on barbecue or panoramic views of night cities and the Milky Way.
– think about what you will do with the footage later. Print 10×15, send small photos by mail or take a photo for the cover of a glossy magazine.
– evaluate your skills. You will use the fully automatic shooting mode so that you just press the button or you have already filled your hand in photography and you will make the necessary settings for the task you need better than any “automatic machines”.
–
How do you decide on these three points. It will be easier to answer and you can reasonably recommend the best option for you.

The quality of the photo does not really depend on the number of pickmels. Will be detailed to you, but grain and muddy. Take it so that no less than 10, but not a Chinese hat

I have 8 megapixels, in principle it’s normal, but it’s better when more, wants 12-13 megapixels

I have 12 megapixels, a good camera, I like it, but if you take a selfie, then this camera is 5 megapixels, it turns out blurry

I have a mini camera 8 on my Samsung C5 better than other phones that have 13.Not Samsung.

I have 8 megapixels, in principle it’s normal, but it’s better when more, wants 12-13 megapixels

On my iphone. 5MP rear and 1.2MP front, the quality is excellent. A friend’s 14 megapixel camera is much worse. In short, the number of megapixels does not affect the quality of the picture, yes, the resolution,

Should be 25 and both. But in fact 15 and 8. (

I have a mini camera 8 on my Samsung C5 better than other phones that have 13.Not Samsung.

This is so-the main quality, the characteristics they lie, the main thing is clarity and brightness, take the Samsung C series, otherwise I have a note, and that different quality on a note is not so clear, even though we are one

You say anything, but the camera still takes better pictures of any fancy phone. My friends both iPhones and non-iPhones are expensive with large pixels, they went to nature, they shot everything, the phone screen is superb, but they dropped it on a computer. My usual nikon is not a mirror the best pictures gave!

Photo contest “Time to love” Article

You say anything, but the camera still takes better pictures of any fancy phone. My friends both iPhones and non-iPhones are expensive with large pixels, they went to nature, they shot everything, the phone screen is superb, but they dropped it on a computer. My usual nikon is not a mirror the best pictures gave!

On an iPhone, blurred photos from the last Samsung? As digital as possible with a background, clear and vivid. But it also costs 2 times more than a fotik

The number of pixels is the number of points from which the image is ultimately composed. The more of these dots, the more detailed the image. And of course, 12 million pixels (megapixels) are better than 2.
But! To get a high-quality photo of a standard 10×15 size, 2-3 megapixels are enough. For a photo the size of an A4 sheet. 4. 6 megapixels. If you want to make photo wallpaper in your room. No less than 10 :).
–
Outcome:
– decide on the task. What you will shoot. The Ivanov family on barbecue or panoramic views of night cities and the Milky Way.
– think about what you will do with the footage later. Print 10×15, send small photos by mail or take a photo for the cover of a glossy magazine.
– evaluate your skills. You will use the fully automatic shooting mode so that you just press the button or you have already filled your hand in photography and you will make the necessary settings for the task you need better than any “automatic machines”.
–
How do you decide on these three points. It will be easier to answer and you can reasonably recommend the best option for you.

Everything is correct. Good cameras in Xiaomi.

The main thing is not the number of picks, but the size of the matrix. In phones, the matrix is ​​small, so there is no point in taking a crazy number of megapixels.

I have a mini camera 8 on my Samsung C5 better than other phones that have 13.Not Samsung.

Gnusmas. Ram. Don’t believe her.

The best camera on the phone Galaxy with Samsung 6.

I have a Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, a 12 megapixel camera, gorgeous photos and many photo modes)) But it costs more than 60 thousand

The number of pixels is the number of points from which the image is ultimately composed. The more of these dots, the more detailed the image. And of course, 12 million pixels (megapixels) are better than 2.
But! To get a high-quality photo of a standard 10×15 size, 2-3 megapixels are enough. For a photo the size of an A4 sheet. 4. 6 megapixels. If you want to make photo wallpaper in your room. No less than 10 :).
–
Outcome:
– decide on the task. What you will shoot. The Ivanov family on barbecue or panoramic views of night cities and the Milky Way.
– think about what you will do with the footage later. Print 10×15, send small photos by mail or take a photo for the cover of a glossy magazine.
– evaluate your skills. You will use the fully automatic shooting mode so that you just press the button or you have already filled your hand in photography and you will make the necessary settings for the task you need better than any “automatic machines”.
–
How do you decide on these three points. It will be easier to answer and you can reasonably recommend the best option for you.

Taking pictures of nature, animals, less often people, city panoramas, too, yes. I’m an amateur. The goal is to post on Instagram, possibly later create a website, blog, print some photos. Thank:-)

Macro photography

For those who like to photograph flowers, butterflies, blades of grass and dewdrops, or anything in close proximity, I have bad news. There are no universal solutions, and Samsung, creating a set of cameras in Ultra, decided to abandon a separate lens for macro photography, it would have helped a lot. But the main camera has such a focal length that you have to shoot relatively close and only then cut out a piece of the picture. I do not recommend using digital zoom, the image quality drops.

But here you also have to relearn this: the temptation to use the second telephoto module with x5 zoom is great, it brings the subject closer. The aperture of this lens is such that it is set up to shoot architecture, nature, but not small objects nearby. It is simply not designed for the task and the result will not be very good in every sense. But the most important thing is that his focusing will suffer, he simply will not be able to give a clear picture at a short distance, the camera has a different focal length.

Let’s take a look at the weed shot. Here it is on the main camera.

But we want a close-up. Using digital zoom x6.

The picture turned out to be soapy, individual petals are not visible. This is clearly not the result we expect.

Switch to telephoto camera, x5 optical zoom in relation to the main one. From the same distance, it does not focus on the subject, you need to move away. But if you switch to x10 in the menu, the result will be more or less acceptable.

I like the Ultra operation in macro mode noticeably less than on the previous flagships of the company or on the Galaxy Fold, where the result is easier (either on the main camera or on a telephoto with x2 zoom). Check out other examples of macro photography on Ultra.

Here’s a visual comparison with the Galaxy Fold.

But in some situations, macro photography, more precisely, using a telephoto lens, becomes an advantage. This is shooting objects in museums, when they are located under glass and are quite far away. Look at the shots on Ultra.

Another important point related to the Ultra optics, the main camera does not process the picture well, which is located closer than 25-30 centimeters from you, there is optical distortion. Look at the photo of the box with the battery in hand.

Notice the blurring of the font on the bottom edge, it creeps up a bit. This is a question of how the camera and optics are set up. And this is the choice of the engineers who built the Ultra for photographs of other scenes, it’s worth remembering and knowing. There are no universal solutions, each has its own strengths and weaknesses. For those who are fond of macro photography, this unit is most likely not suitable.

But you can also shoot in 108-megapixel resolution, cut out the desired piece. This is again a different, unusual paradigm and few people will do it. Although the result is good in some scenes.

1. Introduction
2. Camera specifications on S20 Ultra and 108 megapixel resolution
3. Macro photography
4. Optical, hybrid, and digital zoom. How to shoot and what’s the difference
5. Single frame mode
6. Front camera. 40 megapixels
7. Recording. 8K shooting
8. Conclusions about cameras in Galaxy Ultra. A different experience

In the smartphone market, there is a situation where many people perceive the camera as one of the main parameters of the device, especially when it comes to flagships. When it comes to flagships, we expect the camera to be the best without compromises or flaws. But here the rapid evolution of cameras comes into play, when devices have already acquired several modules with different characteristics and the way we can photograph, which scenes to process is changing. There is nothing perfect in the world, and a straightforward approach to a particular model can bring spoiled nerves and continuous frustration.

People do not change, and this approach wanders from year to year in the minds. The more expensive a smartphone is, the better it photographs, while it remains versatile and does not differ in any way from the models that were a few years ago. This is not the case, and the example of the S20 Ultra clearly demonstrates this. The familiar experience of other Samsung flagships is refracted here and becomes different, for example, you are definitely used to the fact that for macro photography you need to get as close as possible to what you are shooting. In Ultra, everything is exactly the opposite, you need to move away from the subject, otherwise you will not get the desired shot. Different focal lengths of lenses, different choice of sensors. All this leaves an imprint on how this flagship from Samsung takes pictures. In a linear perception of the world, it should be the same as the S20 / S20, but better, since it is more expensive. In reality, it is simply different and was created for other tasks in photography. The basic camera module provides a “point and shoot” mode, but all additional features are very different.

The race in smartphone photography is now taking place between two major players. Samsung and Huawei. over, it was Huawei who made the first move in this struggle, it introduced smartphones with hybrid zoom, increased optical zoom. S20 and Ultra are Samsung’s retaliatory move.

Another important point is that today we are dealing with computational photography, the quality of the resulting images largely depends on what algorithms and how photos are processed on a smartphone. And here the hardware and software bundle is important, for example, the previous module from Samsung, which was used in the flagships, was licked annually for five years, so the company did not change the matrix of the main lens. The Ultra model is the first device from the company, which uses a Quad-Bayer matrix with a resolution of 108 megapixels. This means that this matrix will be in service with the company for at least several years, and the software for it and processing algorithms, the quality of the lenses. All this will undergo changes from generation to generation. The technologies today are such that it is impossible to change the sensor for the camera every year and move to a new generation, the creation of new cameras takes years, and this is not an exaggeration.

Unfortunately, many continue to view the rise in megapixels as an improvement in cameras. For example, I often come across such reasoning that a 64-megapixel camera is certainly better than a 12-megapixel one, and the quality of photos in the first one will be higher. Why? Because 64 is more than 12. Alas, this is not so, and only megapixels do not solve anything, you need to understand and see how the optics are arranged, what opportunities are available to improve images and in what modes the camera works. In this review of the camera on the S20 Ultra, we will try to figure out in detail who this device is suitable for, why a number of users will be unhappy with the fact that they will have to relearn how to take pictures on this smartphone.

Optical, hybrid, and digital zoom. How to shoot and what’s the difference

Samsung’s current generation of flagships are built around zoom, and the company doesn’t want to differentiate between optical, hybrid and digital zoom. This is the approach of marketers who have combined different technologies into a single term Space Zoom. It is clear that for Ultra, the maximum zoom of x100 is digital zoom, and not something else. And here a certain confusion arises, since the logic of the zoom operation for many remains a mystery behind seven seals. In my opinion, the lack of understanding of this point leads to not very good results when shooting. Let’s try to clarify this issue:

• The main module does not have optical zoom. It is a digital zoom of x2, x4 in 12-megapixel mode or up to x6 in 108-megapixel mode;
• Telephoto has a different focal length, which gives x5 in comparison with the main camera (remember that the aperture of this module is lower). Hybrid zoom x10 (both optics and image processing are used).
• X30, x50, x100. This is a digital zoom, and here AI-algorithms are used, which makes the image quality noticeably worse at first glance.

Let’s take a look at the photo of the moon, it was taken in the early evening.

Not a bad photo, which differs from the approach of the same Huawei, where the Moon is substituted from the base of pictures, that is, there you see an ideal photo of an Earth satellite, and not what is in front of you in reality. A sort of collage. At Samsung, this is a real shot, what you see.

Many people noted that when using the maximum zoom, the picture on the smartphone screen looks much better than the photo itself, which is what you end up with.

And this is what the photo looks like. Soapy and rather fuzzy.

You need to understand that AI algorithms for image processing begin to work from a zoom greater than x30, which gives a blurring of the picture. There are no miracles in the world, and the optics that are in the Ultra give far from ideal results. On a clear day, you can get a more or less readable picture, but you cannot say that this is an artistic photo. These are technical photographs, a kind of binoculars.

Long zoom is good in some situations where you don’t need to get close to your subject, such as looking at a photo of a mosaic on the wall of a building or church. It is impossible to take such photos from other smartphones without such a zoom.

At the maximum zoom, the picture shakes, it is quite difficult to capture what you want to shoot if it is a moving object, such as a bird or an airplane. Pictures are quite blurry.

At x30 zoom, a mini-window appears, in which you can see where you point the camera.

Look at how the camera shoots in comparison with the P40 Pro at zoom (in the P40 Pro it is x5 optical, hybrid x10, as well as x50 digital).

As for the disadvantages of the camera, I would like to note that when switching to the telephoto module, the picture jitters, the focus does not work immediately. It takes a little less than a second, but it’s noticeable. It will not work to take a snapshot at x5, more precisely, it can be done, but then there is a high probability that the snapshot will be blurred.

Front camera. 40 megapixels

Unlike other models in the series, it uses a new 40 megapixel module. It’s also a Quad-Bayer sensor, look at how it shoots.

Full resolution of 40 megapixels is very detailed.

Here is a comparison shot with the Galaxy S20 / S20.

Comparison with P40 Pro and iPhone 11 Pro.

The front camera can record excellent quality, 4K 60 frames per second.

Recording. 8K shooting

The new generation of flagships from Samsung has a unique ability to shoot in 8K resolution, competitors do not offer similar capabilities. The emergence of 8K is directly related to the fact that the company’s TVs support 8K resolution and such content can be displayed on them. And as such, these smartphones have no equal, since the picture is very detailed, high-quality.

Another and unusual possibility is that you can cut out any moment from 8K. For example, actually take a freeze frame. And it will be a good quality 33-megapixel image. For example, here I cut out a picture of people riding on a carousel.

This partly solves the question of how to shoot fast moving objects, for example, the same birds. The camera often does not detect movement when taking photos.

Another feature of recording is that several microphones record sound; when zooming, sound amplification is used on the object on which you focus. The microphone on the side surface can catch your breath if you are too close to the camera, do not hold the phone away from your face, but practically buried in the device.

It came as a surprise to me that many people think that 8K is the only shooting format. This is not true. You can record other permissions too.

The picture is not bad, this device, whatever one may say, is a flagship, plus when you watch it on Samsung TVs you get the maximum quality, it seems that the shooting was done on professional equipment. Resolution decides here.

Look at the examples, it’s worth remembering that the zoom is digital in most situations.

Camera specifications on S20 Ultra and 108 megapixel resolution

There are four modules in the main camera block, let’s take a look at their characteristics:

• Ultra wide: 12 MP, 1.4μm, F2.2
• Wide: 108MP, 0.8μm (12MP 2.4μm), F1.8, OIS
• Telephoto: 48 MP, 0.8μm (12 MP 1.6μm), F3.5, OIS
• Depthvision

In order not to go far, I want to focus on a wide-angle camera, it does not have autofocus, which someone has already recorded as terrible flaws. Considering that a wide angle is needed for shooting rooms, architecture, interiors, the lack of autofocus does not matter, the picture should be sharp throughout the entire frame.

A new 108 megapixel module from Samsung is used for the main camera. In this module, 10 pixels are merged into one (91), which turns a 0.8 μm point into 2.4 μm (using the none-binning / re-mosaic algorithm). An image from 108 megapixels turns into 12 megapixels, and its sharpness, contrast, details become very good. In the menu, you can select the original resolution of 108 megapixels, in this case you will only have access to digital zoom x6, other lenses will not be used.

The algorithm of combining pixels into one creates a bright picture, but some of the details are lost, otherwise it simply cannot be. This is how any Quad-Bayer matrix works, this is the basis of this technology.

Let’s take a look at photos at 12 megapixels and 108 megapixels.

The size of a photo in a resolution of 4000×3000 pixels is about 4-7 MB, while in a resolution of 12000×9000 pixels it is about 30-50 MB.

In a colorful photograph taken in the Pharmaceutical Garden, you see the first spring flowers, as well as tablets. A 12-megapixel picture is brighter in color, it is more colorful on a smartphone screen. And this is the first difference between the two resolutions, the default images are always brighter. But in a 108-megapixel image, the colors are slightly more muted, they are more natural, since they were not touched by the image processing algorithm. And here you are free to choose what you like best. Brighter colors or natural.

The next moment, which may surprise you or leave you indifferent, look at how the background is worked out, for example, cut out a piece of the picture from these pictures. This is a sign.

Where the table is blurry, we see a snapshot from 12 megapixels, information is lost during compression, miracles do not happen. But the picture with the maximum resolution allows you to zoom in so that there is no noticeable loss in details. Here’s another pair as an example.

I really like how Ultra shoots at the maximum resolution of the picture, you can literally see every point of the picture. over, in the future, you can cut out the piece that you need. And this is a huge advantage of the device over most other cameras, where the image resolution is lower. Do you need it? The question depends solely on what you are shooting and what you want to get at the end, how much you need individual details. For a photo on social networks, this is probably not so important, here, rather, the overall composition comes to the fore. For product photography, this can be important.

Today, it is Ultra that provides the most detail in the images that you can see or use to cut out a piece of the image. There is even such an opportunity in the interface, you can use a snapshot to get a new “photo”. Zoom the shot the way you want and get a new shot.

Let’s take a look at whether this is possible on devices with other matrices. For example, the same shot on the P40 Pro.

You can see that the main module is 50 megapixels (also Quad-Bayer), but the details are lower here. You cannot choose the resolution in the settings, it is always 4096×3072 pixels.

But what we get on the main camera of the iPhone 11 Pro, there is no need to talk about the possibility of getting a second picture from a low resolution, this option is simply not available.

The example of using the full resolution of 108 megapixels proves the difference in approach that has appeared in the latest generations of smartphones. The user can choose what interests him and how he wants to shoot. But no one can make this choice for him, this is almost a professional tool in which you can vary the quality and result of photos.